Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072698›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Collagen Matrix vs. Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cristina Vallecillo, Manuel Toledano-Osorio, Marta Vallecillo-Rivas, Manuel Toledano, Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla, Raquel Osorio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06880185 (Effects of Ribose Cross-Linked Thick Collagen Membranes and Connective Tissue Grafts on Peri-Implant Tissue), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06880185 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Ribose Cross-Linked Thick Collagen Membranes and Connective Tissue Grafts on Peri-Implant Tissue

TypeinterventionalSponsorÖmer Alperen KırmızıgülRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsPeri-implant Mucosa Thickness, Peri-implant Mucosa Width, Peri-Implant TissuesArmsConnective Tissue Graft, Ribose Cross-Linked Thick Collagen Membrane
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mandibular Rotated Pediculated Flap: A Technique to Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Management of inadequate width of attached gingiva using mucograft.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022
    Article
  16. Preliminary study of silk fibroin porous scaffold for oral soft-tissue thickening.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina VallecilloFaculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4425-2811
Manuel Toledano-OsorioFaculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Marta Vallecillo-RivasFaculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Manuel ToledanoFaculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Alberto Rodriguez-ArchillaFaculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-943X
Raquel OsorioFaculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.

Funding

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and European Regional Development Fund Project MAT2017-85999-P MINECO/AEI/FEDER/UEUniversity of Granada/Regional Government of Andalusia A-BIO-157-UGR-18/FEDER
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft tissues have been shown to be critical for the maintenance of both teeth and implants. Currently, regenerative soft tissue techniques propose the use of collagen matrices, which can avoid the drawbacks derived from the obtainment of autogenous tissue graft. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to ascertain the efficacy of collagen matrices (CM) compared to autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) to improve soft tissue dimensions. An electronic and manual literature searches were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) or controlled clinical trials (CCT) that compared CTG and CM. Pooled data of width of keratinized tissue (KT) and mucosal thickness (MT) were collected and weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I

Indexed as

collagen matriceskeratinized tissuemucosal thicknesssoft tissue graft

Identifiers

PMID34072698
PMCPMC8199411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.