Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072693›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Serum Metabolite Profiles in Participants of Lung Cancer Screening Study; Comparison of Two Independent Cohorts.

Piotr Widłak, Karol Jelonek, Agata Kurczyk, Joanna Żyła, Magdalena Sitkiewicz, Edoardo Bottoni, Giulia Veronesi, Joanna Polańska, Witold Rzyman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Piotr WidłakMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5099-4726
Karol JelonekMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-7695
Agata KurczykMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4124-9385
Joanna ŻyłaSilesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2895-7969
Magdalena SitkiewiczMedical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Edoardo BottoniHumanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Giulia VeronesiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Joanna PolańskaSilesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-9864
Witold RzymanMedical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9044-7791
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLSilesian University of Technology · PLIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland 2017/27/B/NZ7/01833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum metabolome is a promising source of molecular biomarkers that could support early detection of lung cancer in screening programs based on low-dose computed tomography. Several panels of metabolites that differentiate lung cancer patients and healthy individuals were reported, yet none of them were validated in the population at high-risk of developing cancer. Here we analyzed serum metabolome profiles in participants of two lung cancer screening studies: MOLTEST-BIS (Poland,

Indexed as

biomarkersearly detectionlung cancermetabolomicsscreening study

Identifiers

PMID34072693
PMCPMC8198431
OpenAlexW3163978938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.