Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072671›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Implications of Dual Practice on Cataract Surgery Waiting Time and Rescheduling: The Case of Malaysia.

Weng Hong Fun, Ee Hong Tan, Sondi Sararaks, Shakirah Md Sharif, Iqbal Ab Rahim, Suhana Jawahir, Vivien Han Ying Eow, Raoul Muhammad Yusof Sibert, Malindawati Mohd Fadzil, Siti Haniza Mahmud

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07520227 (Comparative Evaluation of 3D-printed Polyetheretherketone), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07520227 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of 3D-printed Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Plates Versus Titanium 3D Plate for Fracture Fixation at the Mandibular Angle

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled22ConditionsFracture MandibleArmsPatient-specific PEEK plates manufactured using CAD/CAM technology and fixed using titanium screws., Conventional 3D titanium plates
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weng Hong FunInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.
Ee Hong TanInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8196-6987
Sondi SararaksInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-3166
Shakirah Md SharifInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1026-1672
Iqbal Ab RahimInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6213-7753
Suhana JawahirInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5665-2479
Vivien Han Ying EowInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.
Raoul Muhammad Yusof SibertHospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah, Muar 84000, Malaysia.
Malindawati Mohd FadzilMedical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya 62590, Malaysia.
Siti Haniza MahmudInstitute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDual practice was implemented in selected Ministry of Health Malaysia hospitals to reduce brain drain and provide an alternative for patients willing to pay higher user fees to seek prompt treatment from the specialist of their choice. This study aimed to assess the implications of dual practice on waiting time and rescheduling for cataract surgery.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted in a referral hospital. Inpatient medical records of patients who underwent cataract procedures were used to study the waiting times to surgery and rescheduling between private and public groups.

resultsPrivate patients had a considerably shorter waiting time for cataract surgery, seven times shorter compared to public patients where all surgeries were conducted after hours on weekdays or weekends. Additionally, 14.9% of public patients experienced surgery rescheduling, while all private patients had their surgeries as planned. The main reason for surgery rescheduling was the medical factor, primarily due to uncontrolled blood pressure and upper respiratory tract infection.

conclusionPrivate service provision utilizing out-of-office hours slots for cataract surgery optimizes public hospital resources, allowing shorter waiting times and providing an alternative to meet healthcare needs.

Indexed as

cancellationdual practiceMalaysiaout-of-office hoursreschedulingsurgerywaiting time

Identifiers

PMID34072671
PMCPMC8228072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.