Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072615›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Interventions and Outcomes for Neoadjuvant Treatment of T4 Colon Cancer: A Scoping Review.

Flora Jung, Keegan Guidolin, Michael Ho-Yan Lee, Kimberley Lam-Tin-Cheung, Grace Zhao, Sachin Doshi, Tyler Chesney, Marina Englesakis, Jelena Lukovic, Grainne O'Kane and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Flora JungFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Keegan GuidolinDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6482-8024
Michael Ho-Yan LeeFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Kimberley Lam-Tin-CheungDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.
Grace ZhaoFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8819-8490
Sachin DoshiDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.
Tyler ChesneyDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.
Marina EnglesakisLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Jelena LukovicRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada.
Grainne O'KaneDivision of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada.
Fayez A QuereshyDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.
Sami A ChadiDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-8994
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While adjuvant treatment of colon cancers that penetrate the serosa (T4) have been well-established, neoadjuvant strategies have yet to be formally evaluated. Our objective was to perform a scoping review of eligibility criteria, treatment regimens, and primary outcomes for neoadjuvant approaches to T4 colon cancer. A librarian-led, systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL up to 11 February 2020 was performed. Primary research evaluating neoadjuvant treatment in T4 colon cancer were included. Screening and data abstraction were performed in duplicate; analyses were descriptive or thematic. A total of twenty studies were included, most of which were single-arm, single-center, and retrospective. The primary objectives of the literature to date has been to evaluate treatment feasibility, tumor response, disease-free survival, and overall survival in healthy patients. Conventional XELOX and FOLFOX chemotherapy were the most commonly administered interventions. Rationale for selecting a specific regimen and for treatment eligibility criteria were poorly documented across studies. The current literature on neoadjuvant strategies for T4 colon cancer is overrepresented by single-center, retrospective studies that evaluate treatment feasibility and efficacy in healthy patients. Future studies should prioritize evaluating clear selection criteria and rationale for specific neoadjuvant strategies. Validation of outcomes in multi-center, randomized trials for XELOX and FOLFOX have the most to contribute to the growing evidence for this poorly managed disease.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalHumansRetrospective Studieschemoradiotherapychemotherapylocally advanced colon cancerneoadjuvant therapyradiotherapyT4 colon cancer

Identifiers

PMID34072615
PMCPMC8261638
OpenAlexW3165250652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.