Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072561›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Psychological Wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Influence of Personality Traits in the Italian Population.

Chiara Rossi, Andrea Bonanomi, Osmano Oasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara RossiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 1, 20123 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-2710
Andrea BonanomiDepartment of Statistical Science, Catholic University of Milan, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 1, 20123 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2857-1430
Osmano OasiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 1, 20123 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2134-397X

Funding

D3.1 line, year 2021, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy D3.1 line, year 2021, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has had a strong psychological impact on the Italian population. Italy was heavily affected by the virus before other countries in Europe, experiencing the highest number of deaths. Unknown symptoms in the early stages of the pandemic and the absence of clear transmission links affected people's wellbeing. Individual personality differences played a key role in perceived psychological wellbeing during the pandemic. The present exploratory study sought to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on psychological health and identify how psychological wellbeing is influenced by personality traits. A total of 2103 participants (64% female and 36% male) completed an online survey that included the Psychological General Wellbeing Index (PGWBI), the Italian Short Personality Inventory (ITAPI), and a general questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical regressions were performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) (The findings showed poor psychological wellbeing in the Italian population. Young people reported the lowest scores. Vulnerability traits negatively influenced some PGWBI domains, such as the total score (β = -0.62), anxiety (β = -0.55), depression (β = -0.46), positivity and wellbeing (β = -0.51), vitality (β = -0.45), general health (β = -0.12), and self-control (β = -0.52). On the other hand, dynamism traits positively affected vitality (β = 0.12) and positivity and wellbeing (β = 0.14). In other words, personality factors related to vulnerability in particular created risk, whereas dynamism offered protection. The results highlight how COVID-19 helped to trigger anxious and depressive states. People feel helpless and vulnerable when facing new, unexpected conditions caused by the virus. These findings may assist mental healthcare professionals in safeguarding psychological wellbeing during emergencies such as the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdolescentAnxietyDepressionEuropeFemaleHumansItalyMalePersonalitySARS-CoV-2coronavirusCOVID-19personality traitspsychological wellbeingvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID34072561
PMCPMC8198634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.