Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072524›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Mobile Robot-Based Gait Training after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Improves Walking in Biomechanical Gait Analysis.

Eric Röhner, Anke Mayfarth, Christian Sternitzke, Frank Layher, Andrea Scheidig, Horst-Michael Groß, Georg Matziolis, Sabrina Böhle, Klaus Sander

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07147530 (Study to Verify Effectiveness and Safety of the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device on Gait Ability in Patients With Hip Joint Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07147530 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Study to Verify Effectiveness and Safety of the Electrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device on Gait Ability in Patients With Hip Joint Diseases: Investigator Initiated, Single Center, Single Group Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsHip DiseaseArmsElectrically Powered Orthopedic Exercise Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric RöhnerOrthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.
Anke MayfarthTediro GmbH, Ehrenbergstr. 11, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Christian SternitzkeTediro GmbH, Ehrenbergstr. 11, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5201-826X
Frank LayherOrthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.
Andrea ScheidigTU Ilmenau, Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, PF 100565, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-7326
Horst-Michael GroßTU Ilmenau, Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, PF 100565, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.
Georg MatziolisOrthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.
Sabrina BöhleOrthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.
Klaus SanderOrthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.

Funding

Thueringer Aufbaubank Germany FKZ: 2015FE9088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are multiple attempts to decrease costs in the healthcare system while maintaining a high treatment quality. Digital therapies receive increasing attention in clinical practice, mainly relating to home-based exercises supported by mobile devices, eventually in combination with wearable sensors. The aim of this study was to determine if patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA) could benefit from gait training on crutches conducted by a mobile robot in a clinical setting.

methodThis clinical trial was conducted with 30 patients following total hip arthroplasty. Fifteen patients received the conventional physiotherapy program in the clinic (including 5 min of gait training supported by a physiotherapist). The intervention group of 15 patients passed the same standard physiotherapy program, but the 5-min gait training supported by a physiotherapist was replaced by 2 × 5 min of gait training conducted by the robot. Length of stay of the patients was set to five days. Biomechanical gait parameters of the patients were assessed pre-surgery and upon patient discharge.

resultsWhile before surgery no significant difference in gait parameters was existent, patients from the intervention group showed a significant higher absolute walking speed (0.83 vs. 0.65 m/s,

conclusionThe significant higher walking speed of patients indicates that such robot-based gait training on crutches may shorten length of stay (LOS) in acute clinics. However, the number of patients involved was rather small, thus calling for further studies.

Indexed as

digital therapiesmobile robotsmotion capturephysiotherapyrehabilitation robots

Identifiers

PMID34072524
PMCPMC8198188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.