ArticleNutrients2021
Expanded Role of a Dietitian in Monitoring a Gluten-Free Diet in Patients with Celiac Disease: Implications for Clinical Practice.
Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) 2025 Updated Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Coeliac Disease in Adults. Part 2: Management, Follow-Up, and Complex Disease Courses.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Guideline
- Management Strategy for Non-Responsive and Refractory Celiac Disease in Adults: A Review Article.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Knowledge and attitudes toward nutritional deficiencies in celiac disease among medical students and healthcare providers in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Adherence, and Barriers to Gluten-Free Diet Among Adults with Celiac Disease in Saudi Arabia: A Pilot Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Madinah, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dietary assessments in individuals living with coeliac disease: key considerations.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Review
- Article
- Importance of an Ongoing Nutritional Counselling Intervention on Eating Habits of Newly Diagnosed Children with Celiac Disease.Nutrients · 2024Article
- The Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease: Critical Insights to Better Understand Clinical Outcomes.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Nutritional Considerations in Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten/Wheat Sensitivity.Nutrients · 2023Review
- The Effect of a Gluten-Free Diet on Vitamin D Metabolism in Celiac Disease: The State of the Art.Metabolites · 2023Review
- The gluten-free diet challenge in adults with coeliac disease: the Hellenic survey.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- An Evaluation of Nutritional Status and Problems with Dietary Compliance in Polish Patients with Celiac Disease.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Nutrition in Patients with Lactose Malabsorption, Celiac Disease, and Related Disorders.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to a registered dietitian experienced in celiac disease (CD) is still limited, and consultation when available focuses primarily on the elimination of gluten from the diet. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional value of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in adult CD patients before, and one year after, the standard dietary education. The study included 72 CD patients on a GFD and 30 healthy controls. The dietary intake of both groups was assessed through a 3-day food diary, while adherence to a GFD in celiac subjects was assessed using Standardized Dietician Evaluation (SDE). Subsequently, all CD patients received detailed education on gluten sources, and 48 of them participated in a one-year follow-up. Results: Comparison with the control group showed that consumption of plant protein in CD patients was significantly lower, whereas fat and calories were higher. At baseline, only 62% of CD patients adhered to a GFD, but the standard dietary education successfully improved it. However, the nutritional value of a GFD after one year did not change, except for a reduced sodium intake. The CD subjects still did not consume enough calcium, iron, vitamin D, folic acid or fiber. In conclusion, while the standard dietary education improved GFD adherence, it did not significantly alter its nutritional value. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the role of a dietitian in the treatment of CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.