Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072407›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulfate: Is There Any Scientific Evidence for Their Effectiveness as Disease-Modifying Drugs in Knee Osteoarthritis Preclinical Studies?-A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2021.

Silvia Fernández-Martín, Antonio González-Cantalapiedra, Fernando Muñoz, Mario García-González, María Permuy, Mónica López-Peña

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia Fernández-MartínAnatomy, Animal Production and Veterinary Clinical Sciences Department, Veterinary Faculty, Campus Universitario s/n, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2576-7438
Antonio González-CantalapiedraAnatomy, Animal Production and Veterinary Clinical Sciences Department, Veterinary Faculty, Campus Universitario s/n, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8586-956X
Fernando MuñozAnatomy, Animal Production and Veterinary Clinical Sciences Department, Veterinary Faculty, Campus Universitario s/n, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-1526
Mario García-GonzálezAnatomy, Animal Production and Veterinary Clinical Sciences Department, Veterinary Faculty, Campus Universitario s/n, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1990-6315
María PermuyIbonelab S.L., Laboratory of Biomaterials, Avda. da Coruña, 500 (CEI-NODUS), 27003 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3708-4821
Mónica López-PeñaAnatomy, Animal Production and Veterinary Clinical Sciences Department, Veterinary Faculty, Campus Universitario s/n, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-4790
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate have been proposed due to their physiological and functional benefits in the management of osteoarthritis in companion animals. However, the scientific evidence for their use is still controversial. The purpose of this review was to critically elucidate the efficacy of these nutraceutical therapies in delaying the progression of osteoarthritis, evaluating their impact on the synovial knee joint tissues and biochemical markers in preclinical studies by systematically reviewing the last two decades of peer-reviewed publications on experimental osteoarthritis. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus and, Web of Science) were screened for eligible studies. Twenty-two articles were included in the review. Preclinical studies showed a great heterogeneity among the experimental designs and their outcomes. Generally, the evaluated nutraceuticals, alone or in combination, did not seem to prevent the subchondral bone changes, the synovial inflammation or the osteophyte formation. However, further experimental studies may be needed to evaluate their effect at those levels. Regarding the cartilage status and biomarkers, positive responses were identified in approximately half of the evaluated articles. Furthermore, beneficial effects were associated with the pre-emptive administrations, higher doses and, multimodality approaches with some combined therapies. However, additional studies in the long term and with good quality and systematic design are required.

Indexed as

animal modelsbiochemical markerscartilagechondroitin sulfateglucosaminenutraceuticalsosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID34072407
PMCPMC8228516
OpenAlexW3164652214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.