Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34072179›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

'Difficult Conversations with Patients'-A Modified Group Objective Structured Clinical Experience for Medical Students.

Piotr Przymuszała, Patrycja Marciniak-Stępak, Magdalena Cerbin-Koczorowska, Martyna Borowczyk, Katarzyna Cieślak, Lidia Szlanga, Łucja Zielińska-Tomczak, Ryszard Marciniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Influence of Personal Experiences of Medical Students on Their Assessment of Delivering Bad News.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Piotr PrzymuszałaDepartment of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8785-724X
Patrycja Marciniak-StępakDepartment of Medical Simulation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Magdalena Cerbin-KoczorowskaDepartment of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0940-1006
Martyna BorowczykDepartment of Medical Simulation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna CieślakMedical Simulation Centre, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Lidia SzlangaDepartment of Medical Simulation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
Łucja Zielińska-TomczakDepartment of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-5773
Ryszard MarciniakDepartment of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a modified Group Objective Structured Clinical Experience (GOSCE) focused on difficult conversations, in which, due to limited time and financial resources, only some students could actively participate in scenarios. We aimed to evaluate the intervention, including differences between them and observers. The intervention was organized for sixth-year medical students at a Polish medical university. The study protocol assumed a pre-post analysis of students' attitudes and self-efficacy of communication skills and their opinions about the intervention. Complete questionnaire pairs were returned by 126 students. The pre-post analysis revealed a significant improvement in their self-efficacy levels of almost all skills as well as their affective attitudes and belief in outcomes of communication learning. The improvement was significant among both the active participants and observers. It also showed a decrease in the motivation score, significant only in females. Regardless of their roles, students had positive opinions about the course and its particular aspects. The modified GOSCE may be an enjoyable and effective learning experience for students, especially in the light of limited resources. However, changes in their motivation score suggest the necessity to increase the importance of communication learning in the curriculum.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceCommunicationCurriculumFemaleHumansMotivationdelivering bad news to patientsdifficult conversations with patientsgroup objective structured clinical experiencemedical studentssimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID34072179
PMCPMC8197999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.