ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Artificial Intelligence-Based Recognition of Different Types of Shoulder Implants in X-ray Scans Based on Dense Residual Ensemble-Network for Personalized Medicine.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advanced Home-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Remote Monitoring Devices and Their Therapeutic Efficacy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for postoperative plain radiographic assessment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current evidence, clinical readiness, and limitations.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning: an important new set of tools for clinical shoulder arthroplasty research.JSES international · 2026Review
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Auto-detection of the coronavirus disease by using deep convolutional neural networks and X-ray photographs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- OA-MEN: a fusion deep learning approach for enhanced accuracy in knee osteoarthritis detection and classification using X-Ray imaging.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Chest X-ray Foreign Objects Detection Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence-based applications in shoulder surgery leaves much to be desired: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Review
- A Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Based System to Classify Shoulder Implant Manufacturers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Taking the Next Step in Personalised Orthopaedic Implantation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Solution in Personalized Computer-Aided Arthroscopy of Shoulder Prostheses.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Re-operations and revisions are often performed in patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). This necessitates an accurate recognition of the implant model and manufacturer to set the correct apparatus and procedure according to the patient's anatomy as personalized medicine. Owing to unavailability and ambiguity in the medical data of a patient, expert surgeons identify the implants through a visual comparison of X-ray images. False steps cause heedlessness, morbidity, extra monetary weight, and a waste of time. Despite significant advancements in pattern recognition and deep learning in the medical field, extremely limited research has been conducted on classifying shoulder implants. To overcome these problems, we propose a robust deep learning-based framework comprised of an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify shoulder implants in X-ray images of different patients. Through our rotational invariant augmentation, the size of the training dataset is increased 36-fold. The modified ResNet and DenseNet are then combined deeply to form a dense residual ensemble-network (DRE-Net). To evaluate DRE-Net, experiments were executed on a 10-fold cross-validation on the openly available shoulder implant X-ray dataset. The experimental results showed that DRE-Net achieved an accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of 85.92%, 84.69%, 85.33%, and 84.11%, respectively, which were higher than those of the state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, we confirmed the generalization capability of our network by testing it in an open-world configuration, and the effectiveness of rotational invariant augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.