Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071866›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Children's Beliefs about Pain: An Exploratory Analysis.

Lindsay T Ives, Kate Stein, Alannah M Rivera-Cancel, Julia K Nicholas, Kristen Caldwell, Nandini Datta, Christian Mauro, Helen Egger, Eve Puffer, Nancy L Zucker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsay T IvesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Kate SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-984X
Alannah M Rivera-CancelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Julia K NicholasDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Kristen CaldwellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Nandini DattaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Christian MauroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Helen EggerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Eve PufferDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2281-821X
Nancy L ZuckerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Duke University · USNYU Langone Health · USStanford University · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Feelings/Body Investigators:Interoceptive Exposure for Children w/Abdominal PainR33MH097959 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZUCKER, NANCY L · 2016 to 2018
$819k
NIMH NIH HHS R33-MH-097959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional abdominal pain (FAP) is one of the most common childhood medical complaints, associated with significant distress and impairment. Little is known about how children understand their pain. Do they attribute it to personal weakness? Do they perceive pain as having global impact, affecting a variety of activities? How do they cope with pain? We explored the pain beliefs of 5- to 9-year-old children with FAP using a novel Teddy Bear Interview task in which children answered questions about a Teddy bear's pain. Responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Results indicate that the majority of young children with FAP are optimistic about pain outcomes. Children generated many types of coping strategies for Teddy's pain and adjusted their calibration of Teddy's pain tolerance dependent on the activity being performed. Early warning signs also emerged: a subset of children were pessimistic about Teddy's pain, and several children identified coping strategies that, while developmentally appropriate, could lead to excessive help seeking if not intervened upon (e.g., physician consultation and shot). The Teddy Bear Interview allows children to externalize their pain, making it a useful tool to access cognitive pain constructs in younger children. Thus, these findings highlight the importance of early intervention for childhood FAP.

Indexed as

child attitudeschildrenfunctional abdominal paininteroceptionpainpain thresholds

Identifiers

PMID34071866
PMCPMC8228747
OpenAlexW3164074240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.