Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071766›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Application of Genomic Data for Reliability Improvement of Pig Breeding Value Estimates.

Ekaterina Melnikova, Artem Kabanov, Sergey Nikitin, Maria Somova, Sergey Kharitonov, Petr Otradnov, Olga Kostyunina, Tatiana Karpushkina, Elena Martynova, Aleksander Sermyagin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ekaterina MelnikovaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0885-8269
Artem KabanovL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Sergey NikitinL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4943-0661
Maria SomovaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Sergey KharitonovL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Petr OtradnovL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Olga KostyuninaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Tatiana KarpushkinaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.
Elena MartynovaCenter of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 3, ul. Nobelya, 143026 Moscow, Russia.
Aleksander SermyaginL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1799-6014
Natalia ZinovievaL.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitzy Estate, Podolsk District, Moscow Region, 142132 Podolsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-6863

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation AAAA-A19-119052190018-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replacement pigs' genomic prediction for reproduction (total number and born alive piglets in the first parity), meat, fatness and growth traits (muscle depth, days to 100 kg and backfat thickness over 6-7 rib) was tested using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction ssGBLUP methodology. These traits were selected as the most economically significant and different in terms of heritability. The heritability for meat, fatness and growth traits varied from 0.17 to 0.39 and for reproduction traits from 0.12 to 0.14. We confirm from our data that ssGBLUP is the most appropriate method of genomic evaluation. The validation of genomic predictions was performed by calculating the correlation between preliminary GEBV (based on pedigree and genomic data only) with high reliable conventional estimates (EBV) (based on pedigree, own phenotype and offspring records) of validating animals. Validation datasets include 151 and 110 individuals for reproduction, meat and fattening traits, respectively. The level of correlation (r) between EBV and GEBV scores varied from +0.44 to +0.55 for meat and fatness traits, and from +0.75 to +0.77 for reproduction traits. Average breeding value (EBV) of group selected on genomic evaluation basis exceeded the group selected on parental average estimates by 22, 24 and 66% for muscle depth, days to 100 kg and backfat thickness over 6-7 rib, respectively. Prediction based on SNP markers data and parental estimates showed a significant increase in the reliability of low heritable reproduction traits (about 40%), which is equivalent to including information about 10 additional descendants for sows and 20 additional descendants for boars in the evaluation dataset.

Indexed as

estimated breeding valuegenomic evaluationgenomic predictionpigsreliability of genomic predictionssGBLUP

Identifiers

PMID34071766
PMCPMC8229591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.