Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071732›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2021

Microfluidic Based Physical Approaches towards Single-Cell Intracellular Delivery and Analysis.

Kiran Kaladharan, Ashish Kumar, Pallavi Gupta, Kavitha Illath, Tuhin Subhra Santra, Fan-Gang Tseng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Microfluidic Microalgae System: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiran KaladharanDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.
Ashish KumarDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.
Pallavi GuptaDepartment of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India.
Kavitha IllathDepartment of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India.
Tuhin Subhra SantraDepartment of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-2155
Fan-Gang TsengDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-6905

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/E/16/1/503062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to deliver foreign molecules into a single living cell with high transfection efficiency and high cell viability is of great interest in cell biology for applications in therapeutic development, diagnostics, and drug delivery towards personalized medicine. Various physical delivery methods have long demonstrated the ability to deliver cargo molecules directly to the cytoplasm or nucleus and the mechanisms underlying most of the approaches have been extensively investigated. However, most of these techniques are bulk approaches that are cell-specific and have low throughput delivery. In comparison to bulk measurements, single-cell measurement technologies can provide a better understanding of the interactions among molecules, organelles, cells, and the microenvironment, which can aid in the development of therapeutics and diagnostic tools. To elucidate distinct responses during cell genetic modification, methods to achieve transfection at the single-cell level are of great interest. In recent years, single-cell technologies have become increasingly robust and accessible, although limitations exist. This review article aims to cover various microfluidic-based physical methods for single-cell intracellular delivery such as electroporation, mechanoporation, microinjection, sonoporation, optoporation, magnetoporation, and thermoporation and their analysis. The mechanisms of various physical methods, their applications, limitations, and prospects are also elaborated.

Indexed as

cell viabilitymicrofluidic devicesphysical methods for intracellular deliverysingle-celltransfection efficiency

Identifiers

PMID34071732
PMCPMC8228766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.