ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Psychometric Characteristics of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Applied in the CENTER-TBI Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review of Advances in Neuroimaging and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2026Review
- Reference values for the quality of life after traumatic brain injury questionnaire and its overall scale from the adult German general population.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Quality of Life Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- The Association Between Daily Registrations of Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms Using an mHealth App and the Retrospective Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Article
- Association Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychopathic Traits Among Justice-Involved Adolescents.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Article
- Measuring Intolerance of Uncertainty After Acquired Brain Injury: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12.Assessment · 2024Article
- Article
- Factorial validity and comparability of the six translations of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire translations: results from the CENTER-TBI study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Influence of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Post-Traumatic Stress, Anxiety, and Depression after Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Internal Validity of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury: Response Shift and Responsiveness.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Patient-Reported Outcome Trajectories after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Management of Psychological Complications Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- Sensitivity of outcome instruments in a priori selected patient groups after traumatic brain injury: Results from the CENTER-TBI study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire in Adolescents after Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Proxies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Traumatic Brain Injury during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemics in Slovenia: A Single Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- Measurement invariance of six language versions of the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 in civilians after traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Reference Values for the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) from General Population Samples in the United Kingdom, Italy, and The Netherlands.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Translation and Linguistic Validation of Outcome Instruments for Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical Practice: A Step-by-Step Approach within the Observational CENTER-TBI Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Developing Brain Injury Resource Facilitation for Acquired Brain Injury: Indications and Unmet Needs.The Journal of head trauma rehabilitationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may lead to impairments in various outcome domains. Since most instruments assessing these are only available in a limited number of languages, psychometrically validated translations are important for research and clinical practice. Thus, our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) applied in the CENTER-TBI study. The study sample comprised individuals who filled in the six-months assessments (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PCL-5, RPQ, QOLIBRI/-OS, SF-36v2/-12v2). Classical psychometric characteristics were investigated and compared with those of the original English versions. The reliability was satisfactory to excellent; the instruments were comparable to each other and to the original versions. Validity analyses demonstrated medium to high correlations with well-established measures. The original factor structure was replicated by all the translations, except for the RPQ, SF-36v2/-12v2 and some language samples for the PCL-5, most probably due to the factor structure of the original instruments. The translation of one to two items of the PHQ-9, RPQ, PCL-5, and QOLIBRI in three languages could be improved in the future to enhance scoring and application at the individual level. Researchers and clinicians now have access to reliable and valid instruments to improve outcome assessment after TBI in national and international health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.