Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071662›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Improvements in Hearing and in Quality of Life after Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in a Consecutive Sample of Adult Patients with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Ville Sivonen, Saku T Sinkkonen, Tytti Willberg, Satu Lamminmäki, Hilkka Jääskelä-Saari, Antti A Aarnisalo, Aarno Dietz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Late Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implant and Quality of Life.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ville SivonenHead and Neck Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5881-6553
Saku T SinkkonenHead and Neck Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Tytti WillbergInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Satu LamminmäkiHead and Neck Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Hilkka Jääskelä-SaariHead and Neck Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Antti A AarnisaloHead and Neck Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Aarno DietzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70029 Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 333525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implantation is increasing worldwide. In adults, bilateral cochlear implants (BICI) are often performed sequentially with a time delay between the first (CI1) and the second (CI2) implant. The benefits of BICI have been reported for well over a decade. This study aimed at investigating these benefits for a consecutive sample of adult patients. Improvements in speech-in-noise recognition after CI2 were followed up longitudinally for 12 months with the internationally comparable Finnish matrix sentence test. The test scores were statistically significantly better for BICI than for either CI alone in all assessments during the 12-month period. At the end of the follow-up period, the bilateral benefit for co-located speech and noise was 1.4 dB over CI1 and 1.7 dB over CI2, and when the noise was moved from the front to 90 degrees on the side, spatial release from masking amounted to an improvement of 2.5 dB in signal-to-noise ratio. To assess subjective improvements in hearing and in quality of life, two questionnaires were used. Both questionnaires revealed statistically significant improvements due to CI2 and BICI. The association between speech recognition in noise and background factors (duration of hearing loss/deafness, time between implants) or subjective improvements was markedly smaller than what has been previously reported on sequential BICI in adults. Despite the relatively heterogeneous sample, BICI improved hearing and quality of life.

Indexed as

adult patientsbilateralcochlear implantconsecutive samplecorrelationetiology of hearing losssequentialspeech recognition in noisesubjective improvement

Identifiers

PMID34071662
PMCPMC8199295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.