Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Use of Respiratory Protection Devices by Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ekaterina A Shashina, Valentina V Makarova, Denis V Shcherbakov, Tatiana S Isiutina-Fedotkova, Nadezhda N Zabroda, Nina A Ermakova, Anton Y Skopin, Oleg V Mitrokhin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Introducing the Monitoring Equipment Mask Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ekaterina A ShashinaInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-6813
Valentina V MakarovaInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Denis V ShcherbakovInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana S Isiutina-FedotkovaInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8423-9243
Nadezhda N ZabrodaInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Nina A ErmakovaInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anton Y SkopinInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Oleg V MitrokhinInstitute of Public Health, Department of General Hygiene, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-0423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of face masks has assumed a leading spot among nonspecific prevention measures during the coronavirus pandemic. The effectiveness of this protective measure depends on the specifics of individual use. The purpose of our study was to analyze the use of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) by medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The evaluation of face mask use was based on the results of a survey of medical students at Sechenov University. There were 988 participants in the study: 97.5% used RPE during the pandemic, 89.1% used disposable medical and hygienic face masks, 27.4% used reusable cloth face masks, and 13.2% used respirators. The majority of respondents (75.2%) were found to wear face masks correctly. However, 17.0% of the respondents were found to cover only their mouths with a face mask, while 7.8% reported often shifting their face mask under the chin due to perceived discomfort. Only 25.1% of respondents changed their disposable face mask after 2-3 h of wearing, while 13.0% decontaminated and used it several times. Most cloth face mask users (93.7%) decontaminated their marks, but only 55.7% of respondents did so daily. Face masks were most often worn in medical organizations (91.5%), and 1.4% of respondents did not use respiratory protection anywhere. In conclusion, we consider it necessary to introduce a special module on nonspecific prevention in the discipline of hygiene.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Protective DevicesStudents, MedicalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2coronavirusCOVID-19 pandemicface maskmedical studentsrespiratory protection devices

Identifiers

PMID34071661
PMCPMC8198429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.