Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071652›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

Circulating RNA in Kidney Cancer: What We Know and What We Still Suppose.

Alessandra Cinque, Riccardo Vago, Francesco Trevisani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Urinary MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Urological Cancers: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Triplet Strategies in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Worthy Option in the First-Line Setting?American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. miRNAs in Cancer (Review of Literature).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra CinqueUrological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-742X
Riccardo VagoUrological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3781-6770
Francesco TrevisaniUrological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milano, Italy.
San Raffaele University of Rome · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cancer represents the 7th most common tumor worldwide, affecting 400,000 people annually. This malignancy, which is the third most frequent cancer among urological diseases, displays a completely different prognosis if the tumor is detected in the early stages or advance phases. Unfortunately, more than 50% of renal cancers are discovered incidentally, with a consistent percentage of cases where the tumor remains clinically silent till the metastatic process is established. In day-to-day clinical practice, no available predictive biomarkers exist, and the existent imaging diagnostic techniques harbor several gaps in terms of diagnosis and prognosis. In the last decade, many efforts have been reported to detect new predictive molecular biomarkers using liquid biopsies, which are less invasive in comparison to renal biopsy. However, until now, there has been no clear evidence that a liquid biopsy biomarker could be relevant to the creation of a precise and tailored medical management in these oncological patients, even though circulating RNA biomarkers remain among the most promising. Given the idea that liquid biopsies will play a future key role in the management of these patients, in the present review, we summarize the current state of circulating RNA (miRNA, lncRNAs, and circRNAs) as possible biomarkers of renal cancer presence and aggressiveness in patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCirculating MicroRNAExtracellular VesiclesHumansKidney NeoplasmsRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNARNA, Long Noncodingbiomarkersliquid biopsynon-coding RNArenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34071652
PMCPMC8227397
OpenAlexW3165254916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.