Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071608›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effect of Chitosan and Naringin on Enteric Methane Emissions in Crossbred Heifers Fed Tropical Grass.

Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo, María Denisse Montoya-Flores, Esperanza Herrera-Torres, Gerardo Pámanes-Carrasco, Jeyder Israel Arceo-Castillo, Sara Stephanie Valencia-Salazar, Jacobo Arango, Carlos Fernando Aguilar-Pérez, Luis Ramírez-Avilés, Francisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael Jiménez-OcampoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan, Merida C.P. 97100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2171-1357
María Denisse Montoya-FloresNational Center for Disciplinary Research in Physiology and Animal Breeding, National Institute for Forestry, Crops, and Livestock Research-Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ajuchitlan C.P. 76280, Mexico.
Esperanza Herrera-TorresNational Technologic of Mexico, Technological Institute of Valle del Guadiana, Durango C.P. 34371, Mexico.
Gerardo Pámanes-CarrascoInstitute of Silviculture and Wood Industry, National Council of Science and Technology-Durango State Juarez University, Durango CP 34126, Mexico.
Jeyder Israel Arceo-CastilloFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan, Merida C.P. 97100, Mexico.
Sara Stephanie Valencia-SalazarCollege of the Southern Border (ECOSUR), Livestock and Environment, San Cristobal de las Casas C.P. 29290, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-608X
Jacobo ArangoInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Palmira C.P. 763537, Colombia.
Carlos Fernando Aguilar-PérezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan, Merida C.P. 97100, Mexico.
Luis Ramírez-AvilésFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan, Merida C.P. 97100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-8558
Francisco Javier Solorio-SánchezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan, Merida C.P. 97100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-8639
Ángel Trinidad Piñeiro-VázquezNational Technologic of Mexico, Technological Institute of Conkal, Conkal C.P. 97345, Mexico.
Juan Carlos Ku-VeraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Yucatan, Merida C.P. 97100, Mexico.
Autonomous University of Yucatán · MXEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur · MXInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture · COTecnológico Nacional de México · MXUniversidad Juárez del Estado de Durango · MX

Funding

Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security aClimate Food and Farming Global Research Alliance Scholarships Round 4Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to meet consumer needs, the livestock industry is increasingly seeking natural feed additives with the ability to improve the efficiency of nutrient utilization, alternatives to antibiotics, and mitigate methane emissions in ruminants. Chitosan (CHI) is a polysaccharide with antimicrobial capability against protozoa and Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, fungi, and yeasts while naringin (NA) is a flavonoid with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. First, an in vitro gas production experiment was performed adding 0, 1.5, 3.0 g/kg of CHI and NA under a completely randomized design. The substrate containing forage and concentrate in a 70:30 ratio on a dry matter (DM) basis. Compounds increased the concentration of propionic acid, and a significant reduction in methane production was observed with the inclusion of CHI at 1.5 g/kg in in vitro experiments (

Indexed as

additiveantimicrobial actionchitinflavonoidgreenhouse gases

Identifiers

PMID34071608
PMCPMC8226738
OpenAlexW3164327257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.