Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071038›Full record

SynthesisToxins2021

A Meta-Analysis of the Protein Components in Rattlesnake Venom.

Anant Deshwal, Phuc Phan, Jyotishka Datta, Ragupathy Kannan, Suresh Kumar Thallapuranam

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Animal venoms: a novel source of anti-Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anant DeshwalDivision of Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-9335
Phuc PhanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Jyotishka DattaDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Ragupathy KannanDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas-Fort Smith, Fort Smith, AR 72913, USA.
Suresh Kumar ThallapuranamDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Arkansas – Fort Smith · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

National Science Foundation DMS-2015460NIH HHS R01 CA172631/CA/NCI & P30 GM103450/GM/NIGMSU.S. Department of Energy DE-FG02-01ER15161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specificity and potency of venom components give them a unique advantage in developing various pharmaceutical drugs. Though venom is a cocktail of proteins, rarely are the synergy and association between various venom components studied. Understanding the relationship between various components of venom is critical in medical research. Using meta-analysis, we observed underlying patterns and associations in the appearance of the toxin families. For

Indexed as

AnimalsCrotalid VenomsCrotalusPhylogenyProteinsToxins, BiologicalCrotalid VenomsProteinsToxins, BiologicalassociationCrotalusrattlesnakeSistrurustoxinvenom

Identifiers

PMID34071038
PMCPMC8224588
OpenAlexW3165811285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.