Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34071025›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Bone Diagenesis in Short Timescales: Insights from an Exploratory Proteomic Analysis.

Noemi Procopio, Caley A Mein, Sefora Starace, Andrea Bonicelli, Anna Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noemi ProcopioForensic Science Research Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7461-7586
Caley A MeinSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.
Sefora StaraceDipartimento di Chimica, University of Turin, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Turin, Italy.
Andrea BonicelliForensic Science Research Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Anna WilliamsSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.
Northumbria University · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GBUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S032878/1Royal Society RGS/R1/191371UK Research and Innovation MR/S032878/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of bone diagenetic phenomena in archaeological timescales has a long history; however, little is known about the origins of the microbes driving bone diagenesis, nor about the extent of bone diagenesis in short timeframes-such as in forensic contexts. Previously, the analysis of non-collagenous proteins (NCPs) through bottom-up proteomics revealed the presence of potential biomarkers useful in estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI). However, there is still a great need for enhancing the understanding of the diagenetic processes taking place in forensic timeframes, and to clarify whether proteomic analyses can help to develop better models for estimating PMI reliably. To address these knowledge gaps, we designed an experiment based on whole rat carcasses, defleshed long rat bones, and excised but still-fleshed rat limbs, which were either buried in soil or exposed on a clean plastic surface, left to decompose for 28 weeks, and retrieved at different time intervals. This study aimed to assess differences in bone protein relative abundances for the various deposition modalities and intervals. We further evaluated the effects that extrinsic factors, autolysis, and gut and soil bacteria had on bone diagenesis via bottom-up proteomics. Results showed six proteins whose abundance was significantly different between samples subjected to either microbial decomposition (gut or soil bacteria) or to environmental factors. In particular, muscle- and calcium-binding proteins were found to be more prone to degradation by bacterial attack, whereas plasma and bone marrow proteins were more susceptible to exposure to extrinsic agents. Our results suggest that both gut and soil bacteria play key roles in bone diagenesis and protein decay in relatively short timescales, and that bone proteomics is a proficient resource with which to identify microbially-driven versus extrinsically-driven diagenesis.

Indexed as

bioerosionbone proteomicsforensic sciencesmicrobial decompositionPMItaphonomy

Identifiers

PMID34071025
PMCPMC8224596
OpenAlexW3164808361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.