ReviewGenes2021
Transcriptome Profile Alterations with Carbon Nanotubes, Quantum Dots, and Silver Nanoparticles: A Review.
Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do We Know Enough About the Safety Profile of Silver Nanoparticles in Oncology? A Focus on Novel Methods and Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Applications of Green Carbon Dots in Personalized Diagnostics for Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Effect of Caffeic Acid and a Static Magnetic Field on Human Fibroblasts at the Molecular Level - Next-generation Sequencing Analysis.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Article
- CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots' Impact on In Vitro Actin Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Impact of Cadmium Selenide Zinc Sulfide Quantum Dots on the Proteomic Profile ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Interactions between Quantum Dots and G-Actin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Current Advances in the Biomedical Applications of Quantum Dots: Promises and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Changes in the Expression Profile of Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Senescent Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells after Lutein Treatment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has revolutionized sequence-based research. In recent years, high-throughput sequencing has become the method of choice in studying the toxicity of chemical agents through observing and measuring changes in transcript levels. Engineered nanomaterial (ENM)-toxicity has become a major field of research and has adopted microarray and newer RNA-Seq methods. Recently, nanotechnology has become a promising tool in the diagnosis and treatment of several diseases in humans. However, due to their high stability, they are likely capable of remaining in the body and environment for long periods of time. Their mechanisms of toxicity and long-lasting effects on our health is still poorly understood. This review explores the effects of three ENMs including carbon nanotubes (CNTs), quantum dots (QDs), and Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) by cross examining publications on transcriptomic changes induced by these nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.