Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070951›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Circulating Cell-Free DNA for Cholangiocarcinoma.

Preawwalee Wintachai, Jing Quan Lim, Anchalee Techasen, Worachart Lert-Itthiporn, Sarinya Kongpetch, Watcharin Loilome, Jarin Chindaprasirt, Attapol Titapun, Nisana Namwat, Narong Khuntikeo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cholangiocarcinoma: The era of liquid biopsy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Preawwalee WintachaiBiomedical Sciences Program, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Jing Quan LimLymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Anchalee TechasenCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Worachart Lert-ItthipornDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-0169
Sarinya KongpetchCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Watcharin LoilomeCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-5577
Jarin ChindaprasirtCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Attapol TitapunCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Nisana NamwatCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6743-5047
Narong KhuntikeoCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Apinya JusakulCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7652-7771
Khon Kaen University · THDuke-NUS Medical School · SG

Funding

Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care program, Khon Kaen University, Thailand CASCAP016Khon Kaen University KKU63The Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation B05F630053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of cfDNA has been applied as a liquid biopsy in several malignancies. However, its value in the diagnosis and prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) have not been well defined. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of cfDNA level and tumor-specific mutation in circulating DNA (ctDNA) in CCA. The plasma cfDNA levels from 62 CCA patients, 33 benign biliary disease (BBD) patients and 30 normal controls were quantified by fluorescent assay. Targeted probe-based sequencing of 60 genes was applied for mutation profiling in 10 ctDNA samples and their corresponding treatment-naïve tissues. cfDNA levels in CCA were significantly higher than those in BBD and normal controls. We found that cfDNA levels at 0.2175 and 0.3388 ng/µL significantly discriminated CCA from healthy controls and BBD with 88.7 and 82.3% sensitivity and 96.7 and 57.6% specificity, respectively. cfDNA levels showed superior diagnostic efficacy in detecting CCA compared to CEA and CA19-9.

Indexed as

bile duct cancercell-free DNAcirculating tumor DNAdiagnosisliquid biopsyprognosissequencing

Identifiers

PMID34070951
PMCPMC8228499
OpenAlexW3164622239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.