ArticleCancers2021
Repetitively Administered Low-Dose Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Prevention of Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Acute Leukemia.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current and emerging maintenance strategies after stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with acute leukemias.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Repeated courses of sequential venetoclax and donor lymphocyte infusions in a patient with relapsed high-risk myelodysplasia following allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Current scenario of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in adults over 70 years old.Blood · 2025Review
- A multicenter study of posttransplantation low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood advances · 2024Article
- The graft-versus-leukemia effect of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is equally effective in relapse prevention but safer compared to spontaneous graft-versus-host disease.Annals of hematology · 2023Article
- Pre-emptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.International journal of hematology · 2023Review
- Article
- How I treat high-risk acute myeloid leukemia using preemptive adoptive cellular immunotherapy.Blood · 2023Article
- Novel strategies to prevent and overcome relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) post haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy): crossing the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) barrier.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
- Pharmacologic Strategies for Post-Transplant Maintenance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: It Is Time to Consider!Cancers · 2022Review
- Is It Possible to Separate the Graft-Versus-Leukemia (GVL) Effect Against B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia From Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with high-risk acute leukemia have a high risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In an effort to reduce the relapse rate, various therapeutic methods have been implemented into clinical practice. Among them, prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pro-DLI) has shown significant efficacy. However, the widespread application of pro-DLI has been restricted mostly due to concerns regarding the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD). In the present study, we tested the safety and efficacy of a novel method of prophylactic-DLI based by repetitive administration of low lymphocyte doses.
methodsDLI was administered to patients with high-risk acute leukemia at a dose of 2 × 10
resultsThirty-five patients completed the scheduled treatment and received a median of 8 DLI doses (range 1-35). Fifteen out of 35 patients received all planned doses, while DLI was discontinued in 20 patients. Reasons for discontinuation included GVHD development in nine, donor unavailability in seven, disease relapse in three, and secondary malignancy in one patient, respectively. Nine patients were still on treatment with DLI, and they received a median of four (range 2-12) doses. Fourteen percent of patients developed transient grade-II acute GVHD while 12% developed chronic GVHD post-DLI administration. Acute GVHD was managed successfully with short course steroids, and four out of five patients with cGVHD were disease-free and off immunosuppression. With a median follow-up of 44 months (range 8-120), relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74%, (95% CI, 54-87%) and 78%, (95% CI, 58-89%) respectively, while the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 13% (95% CI, 4-28%). The cumulative incidence of relapse in patients with intermediate and high DRI is 7% and 15%, respectively.
conclusionProlonged-up to three years-low-dose pro-DLI administered every two months is safe and effective in reducing relapse rate in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. The low-dose repetitive administration DLI strategy reduced the risk of DLI-mediated GVHD, while the prolonged repeated administration helped in preventing relapse, possibly by inducing a sustained and prolonged immunological pressure on residual leukemic cells. This novel strategy deserves testing in larger cohort of patients with high-risk acute leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.