Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070781›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Apex Resection in Zebrafish (

Ditte Gry Ellman, Ibrahim Mohamad Slaiman, Sabrina Bech Mathiesen, Kristian Skriver Andersen, Wolfgang Hofmeister, Elke Annette Ober, Ditte Caroline Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Zebrafish in Cardiovascular Disease Research: from Model to Application.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Altered Expression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ditte Gry EllmanDCA-Lab, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 25, 1. Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Ibrahim Mohamad SlaimanDCA-Lab, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 25, 1. Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Sabrina Bech MathiesenDCA-Lab, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 25, 1. Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Kristian Skriver AndersenDCA-Lab, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 25, 1. Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Wolfgang HofmeisterDCA-Lab, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 25, 1. Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Elke Annette OberFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, DanStem (Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology), Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 København H, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5195-1012
Ditte Caroline AndersenDCA-Lab, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 25, 1. Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4940-7912

Funding

Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark NADep. Of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology/Odense University Hospital NAThe Danish National Research Council, Sapere Aude 8045-00019BThe Lundbeck Foundation R313-2019-573The Novo Nordisk Foundation Section for Basic Stem Cell Biology NNF17CC0027852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of deaths worldwide. A major hindrance to resolving this challenge lies in the mammalian hearts inability to regenerate after injury. In contrast, zebrafish retain a regenerative capacity of the heart throughout their lifetimes. Apex resection (AR) is a popular zebrafish model for studying heart regeneration, and entails resecting 10-20% of the heart in the apex region, whereafter the regeneration process is monitored until the heart is fully regenerated within 60 days. Despite this popularity, video tutorials describing this technique in detail are lacking. In this paper we visualize and describe the entire AR procedure including anaesthesia, surgery, and recovery. In addition, we show that the concentration and duration of anaesthesia are important parameters to consider, to balance sufficient levels of sedation and minimizing mortality. Moreover, we provide examples of how zebrafish heart regeneration can be assessed both in 2D (immunohistochemistry of heart sections) and 3D (analyses of whole, tissue cleared hearts using multiphoton imaging). In summary, this paper aims to aid beginners in establishing and conducting the AR model in their laboratory, but also to spur further interest in improving the model and its evaluation.

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsAminobenzoatesAnesthesia, Cardiac ProceduresAnestheticsAnimalsCardiac Imaging TechniquesCardiac Surgical ProceduresCell ProliferationHeartHumansKinetocardiographyMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationZebrafishAminobenzoatesAnestheticstricaineanaesthesiaapex resectionheartregenerationsurgical videoszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34070781
PMCPMC8199168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.