Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070751›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Results of a Prospective Trial to Compare

Lucia Baratto, Akira Toriihara, Negin Hatami, Carina M Aparici, Guido Davidzon, Craig S Levin, Andrei Iagaru

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03081767 (Comparison of Standard PET/CT vs. Digital PET/CT), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03081767 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Standard PET/CT vs. Digital PET/CT

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled199ConditionsCancerArmsDigital PET/CT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  2. Application of PET/CT in Preoperative Evaluation and Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucia BarattoDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA.
Akira ToriiharaPET Imaging Center, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi 289-1101, Japan.
Negin HatamiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA.
Carina M ApariciDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA.
Guido DavidzonDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-6825
Craig S LevinMolecular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Andrei IagaruDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA.
Stanford University · USAsahi General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We prospectively enrolled patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). They underwent a single

Indexed as

68Ga-DOTA-TATE PETneuroendocrine tumorPET/CTsilicon photomultiplier

Identifiers

PMID34070751
PMCPMC8228776
OpenAlexW3164661563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.