ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Mine Vegetation Identification via Ecological Monitoring and Deep Belief Network.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Based on the characteristics of remote sensing images of mine vegetation, this research studied the application of deep belief network model in mine vegetation identification. Through vegetation identification and classification, the ecological environment index of mining area was determined according to the analysis of vegetation and coverage. Deep learning algorithm is adopted to improve the depth study, the vegetation coverage in the analysis was studied. Parameters and parameter values were selected for identification by establishing the optimal experimental design. The experimental results were compared with remote sensing images to determine the accuracy of deep learning identification and the effectiveness of the algorithm. When the sample size is 2,000,000 pixels, through repeated tests and classification effect comparison, the optimal parameter setting suitable for mine vegetation identification is obtained. Parameter setting: the number of network layers is 3 layers; the number of hidden layer neurons is 60. The learning rate is 0.01 and the number of iterations is 2. The average recognition rate of vegetation coverage was 95.95%, outperforming some other models, and the accuracy rate of kappa coefficient was 0.95, which can accurately reflect the vegetation coverage. The clearer the satellite image is, the more accurate the recognition result is, and the accuracy is closer to 100%. The identification of vegetation coverage has important guiding significance for determining the area and area of ecological restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.