Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070721›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

X-ray Diffraction Analysis and Williamson-Hall Method in USDM Model for Estimating More Accurate Values of Stress-Strain of Unit Cell and Super Cells (2 × 2 × 2) of Hydroxyapatite, Confirmed by Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Test.

Marzieh Rabiei, Arvydas Palevicius, Amir Dashti, Sohrab Nasiri, Ahmad Monshi, Akram Doustmohammadi, Andrius Vilkauskas, Giedrius Janusas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Room Temperature Crystallized Phase-Pure α-FAPbIAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marzieh RabieiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-0393-1946
Arvydas PaleviciusFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-1226-062X
Amir DashtiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11365-9466, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0276-2530
Sohrab NasiriFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Ahmad MonshiDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84154, Iran.
Akram DoustmohammadiMaterials and Energy Research Center (MERC), Meshkin-Dasht, Karaj 31787-316, Iran.
Andrius VilkauskasFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Giedrius JanusasFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-1055-2568
Kaunas University of Technology · LTIsfahan University of Technology · IRMaterials and Energy Research Center · IRSharif University of Technology · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking into account X-ray diffraction, one of the well-known methods for calculating the stress-strain of crystals is Williamson-Hall (W-H). The W-H method has three models, namely (1) Uniform deformation model (UDM); (2) Uniform stress deformation model (USDM); and (3) Uniform deformation energy density model (UDEDM). The USDM and UDEDM models are directly related to the modulus of elasticity (E). Young's modulus is a key parameter in engineering design and materials development. Young's modulus is considered in USDM and UDEDM models, but in all previous studies, researchers used the average values of Young's modulus or they calculated Young's modulus only for a sharp peak of an XRD pattern or they extracted Young's modulus from the literature. Therefore, these values are not representative of all peaks derived from X-ray diffraction; as a result, these values are not estimated with high accuracy. Nevertheless, in the current study, the W-H method is used considering the all diffracted planes of the unit cell and super cells (2 × 2 × 2) of Hydroxyapatite (HA), and a new method with the high accuracy of the W-H method in the USDM model is presented to calculate stress (σ) and strain (ε). The accounting for the planar density of atoms is the novelty of this work. Furthermore, the ultrasonic pulse-echo test is performed for the validation of the novelty assumptions.

Indexed as

hydroxyapatiteplanar densityultrasonic pulse-echouniform stress deformation model (USDM)Williamson-Hall (W-H)X-ray diffractionYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID34070721
PMCPMC8198306
OpenAlexW3165463737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.