Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070619›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

What Can Glioma Patients Teach Us about Language (Re)Organization in the Bilingual Brain: Evidence from fMRI and MEG.

Ileana Quiñones, Lucia Amoruso, Iñigo Cristobal Pomposo Gastelu, Santiago Gil-Robles, Manuel Carreiras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ileana QuiñonesNeurobiology of Language Group, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0288-364X
Lucia AmorusoNeurobiology of Language Group, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Iñigo Cristobal Pomposo GasteluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Cruces, 48903 Bilbao, Spain.
Santiago Gil-RoblesBioCruces Research Institute, 48015 Bilbao, Spain.
Manuel CarreirasNeurobiology of Language Group, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6726-7613

Funding

Basque Government BERC 2018 2021 programFundación Científica AECC (FCAECC) PROYE20005CARRJuan de la Cierva Fellowship IJCI 2017 31373Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RTI2018 093547 B I00 (LANGCONN)Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RTI2018 096216 A I00 (MEGLIOMA)Spanish State Research Agency BCBL Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation SEV 2015 0490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the presence of brain tumors (e.g., low-grade gliomas) triggers language reorganization. Neuroplasticity mechanisms called into play can transfer linguistic functions from damaged to healthy areas unaffected by the tumor. This phenomenon has been reported in monolingual patients, but much less is known about the neuroplasticity of language in the bilingual brain. A central question is whether processing a first or second language involves the same or different cortical territories and whether damage results in diverse recovery patterns depending on the language involved. This question becomes critical for preserving language areas in bilingual brain-tumor patients to prevent involuntary pathological symptoms following resection. While most studies have focused on intraoperative mapping, here, we go further, reporting clinical cases for five bilingual patients tested before and after tumor resection, using a novel multimethod approach merging neuroimaging information from fMRI and MEG to map the longitudinal reshaping of the language system. Here, we present four main findings. First, all patients preserved linguistic function in both languages after surgery, suggesting that the surgical intervention with intraoperative language mapping was successful in preserving cortical and subcortical structures necessary for brain plasticity at the functional level. Second, we found reorganization of the language network after tumor resection in both languages, mainly reflected by a shift of activity to right hemisphere nodes and the recruitment of ipsilesional left nodes. Third, we found that this reorganization varied according to the language involved, indicating that L1 and L2 follow different reshaping patterns after surgery. Fourth, oscillatory longitudinal effects were correlated with BOLD laterality changes in superior parietal and middle frontal areas. These findings may reflect that neuroplasticity impacts on the compensatory involvement of executive control regions, supporting the allocation of cognitive resources as a consequence of increased attentional demands. Furthermore, these results hint at the complementary role of this neuroimaging approach in language mapping, with fMRI offering excellent spatial localization and MEG providing optimal spectrotemporal resolution.

Indexed as

bilingualismfMRIfunctional mappingglioma patientsMEG

Identifiers

PMID34070619
PMCPMC8198785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.