Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070470›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effects of Different Scratch Mat Designs on Hen Behaviour and Eggs Laid in Enriched Cages.

Victoria Sandilands, Laurence Baker, Jo Donbavand, Sarah Brocklehurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Dust Bath Design on Hen Behavior in New Aviary Systems in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Dietary supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria SandilandsEaster Bush Campus, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0806-3535
Laurence BakerEaster Bush Campus, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Jo DonbavandEaster Bush Campus, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Sarah BrocklehurstBioSS, JCMB, The Kings Buildings, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK.

Funding

Scottish Government RESAS 2016-2022, RD 2.2.8 and 2.3.11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laying hens in the UK and EU must be provided with litter for pecking and scratching. In enriched cages, this is commonly provided by dispensing layer's feed onto a scratch mat. Mats vary in design and size, which might affect hen behaviour and egg quality, since eggs are sometimes laid at the mats. We investigated if four different scratch mats (BD, K, V, Z) provided to hens in enriched cages resulted in differences in behaviour on the mats and external egg quality. Twenty-four 60-bird cages (6 cages/bank × 4 banks) with 2 mats/cage at one tier of a commercial enriched cage unit were used. Mats were allocated to cages in a balanced design prior to the flock arriving. Hens and eggs were studied at 30, 50 and 79 weeks of age, with three behaviour observations (before, during or after scratch feed application). The data were analysed by GLMMs or LMMs. The vast proportions of birds on the mats were standing (0.720) or sitting (0.250). Bird proportions on the mats were low overall and declined from 0.028 (30 weeks) and 0.030 (50 weeks) to 0.020 (79 weeks) (

Indexed as

dustbathingegg qualityforagingfurnished cageslaying hen

Identifiers

PMID34070470
PMCPMC8230083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.