Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070338›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

AdipoRon and Other Adiponectin Receptor Agonists as Potential Candidates in Cancer Treatments.

Ersilia Nigro, Aurora Daniele, Alessia Salzillo, Angela Ragone, Silvio Naviglio, Luigi Sapio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ersilia NigroDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Biologiche Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Aurora DanieleDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Biologiche Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9085-9737
Alessia SalzilloDipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Napoli, Italy.
Angela RagoneDipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Napoli, Italy.
Silvio NaviglioDipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Napoli, Italy.
Luigi SapioDipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6774-9815
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high mortality rate together with an ever-growing number of annual cases have defined neoplastic disorders as "the real 21st-century disease". Its dubious distinction also results from conventional therapy failure, which has made cancer an orphan disease. Therefore, innovative and alternative therapeutic strategies are mandatory. The ability to leverage human naturally occurring anti-tumor defenses has always represented a fascinating perspective, and the immuno blockage approval in cancer treatment represents in timeline the latest success. As a multifunctional organ, adipose tissue releases a large amount of adipokines having both carcinogenic and antitumor properties. The negative correlation between serum levels and risk for developing malignancies, as well as the huge number of existing preclinical studies, have identified adiponectin as a potential anticancer adipokine. Nevertheless, its usage in clinical has constantly clashed with the inability to reproduce a mimic synthetic compound. Between 2011 and 2013, two distinct adiponectin receptor agonists were recognized, opening new scenarios even in cancer. Here, we review the first orally active adiponectin receptor agonists AdipoRon, from the discovery to the anticancer evidence. Including our latest findings in osteosarcoma models, we summarize AdipoRon and other existing agonists state-of-art, questioning about the feasibility assessment of this strategy in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm ProteinsOsteosarcomaPiperidinesReceptors, AdiponectinAdipoRonNeoplasm ProteinsPiperidinesReceptors, AdiponectinadiponectinAdipoRonneoplasmsosteosarcomatherapy

Identifiers

PMID34070338
PMCPMC8197554
OpenAlexW3164817530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.