ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Comparison of Fissure Sealant Chair Time and Patients' Preference Using Three Different Isolation Techniques.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05749991 (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Fissure Sealant Retention Rate, Chair Time, and Patients' Preference Using Dryshield and Cotton Roll Isolation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Fissure Sealant Retention Rate, Chair Time, and Patients' Preference Using Dryshield and Cotton Roll Isolation
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sealant retention, patient satisfaction, and operator preference: a split-mouth randomised controlled trial comparing EasyPrepEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Trial
- Optimizing Pediatric Patient Comfort: A Study of Moisture Isolation Techniques During Dental Treatments.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Flowable Composite and Moisture-tolerant Resin-based Sealant: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Efficiency and Patient-reported Outcomes for Isolite System: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Review
- A concise review of dental sealants in caries management.Frontiers in oral health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the patient's preference and chair time needed during pit and fissure sealant placement under three isolation techniques (Isolite system, rubber dam isolation, and cotton roll isolation). Participants, aged 6-15 years and requiring four sealants on the first or second permanent molars, attending the pediatric dental clinics at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria. Each participant received sealants on three random first or second permanent molars using three isolation techniques. The time required for sealant placement was recorded for each technique. Following sealant placement, an interview-based questionnaire was administered to the participants to evaluate their preference regarding the isolation techniques. Forty-eight children (23 male and 25 female) with a mean age of 8.58 ± 1.93 years participated in this study. The mean chair times were 248.14, 255.89, and 243.29 s for the Isolite system, rubber dam isolation, and cotton roll isolation, respectively. Approximately 79% of participants considered cotton roll isolation to be the most comfortable, whereas approximately 71% were significantly less likely to use rubber dam isolation again. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in sealant placement time among the three isolation techniques. However, cotton roll isolation was the technique that was most preferred by the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.