Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070175›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

Overview of Bat and Wildlife Coronavirus Surveillance in Africa: A Framework for Global Investigations.

Marike Geldenhuys, Marinda Mortlock, Jonathan H Epstein, Janusz T Pawęska, Jacqueline Weyer, Wanda Markotter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A NovelViruses · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marike GeldenhuysCentre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-118X
Marinda MortlockCentre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9286-1040
Jonathan H EpsteinCentre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-9301
Janusz T PawęskaCentre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-7519
Jacqueline WeyerCentre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Wanda MarkotterCentre for Viral Zoonoses, Department of Medical Virology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7550-0080
University of Pretoria · ZAEcoHealth Alliance · USRespiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Department of the Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency HDTRA1-20-1-0025National Research Foundation of South Africa 98339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had devastating health and socio-economic impacts. Human activities, especially at the wildlife interphase, are at the core of forces driving the emergence of new viral agents. Global surveillance activities have identified bats as the natural hosts of diverse coronaviruses, with other domestic and wildlife animal species possibly acting as intermediate or spillover hosts. The African continent is confronted by several factors that challenge prevention and response to novel disease emergences, such as high species diversity, inadequate health systems, and drastic social and ecosystem changes. We reviewed published animal coronavirus surveillance studies conducted in Africa, specifically summarizing surveillance approaches, species numbers tested, and findings. Far more surveillance has been initiated among bat populations than other wildlife and domestic animals, with nearly 26,000 bat individuals tested. Though coronaviruses have been identified from approximately 7% of the total bats tested, surveillance among other animals identified coronaviruses in less than 1%. In addition to a large undescribed diversity, sequences related to four of the seven human coronaviruses have been reported from African bats. The review highlights research gaps and the disparity in surveillance efforts between different animal groups (particularly potential spillover hosts) and concludes with proposed strategies for improved future biosurveillance.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAnimals, WildChiropteraCoronaviridaeCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EcosystemEpidemiological MonitoringGenetic VariationGenome, ViralPandemicsPhylogenySARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAfricaAfrican bat coronavirusesbatbiosurveillancecoronavirusesCOVID-19domestic animalsemergingHCoV-229EHCoV-NL63MERS-CoVSARS-CoVSARS-CoV 2surveillancesurveillance strategieswildlife

Identifiers

PMID34070175
PMCPMC8158508
OpenAlexW3161865958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.