Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070145›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Occupational Exposures and Environmental Health Hazards of Military Personnel.

Marta Geretto, Marco Ferrari, Roberta De Angelis, Filippo Crociata, Nicola Sebastiani, Alessandra Pulliero, William Au, Alberto Izzotti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Incidence rates of bladder and kidney cancers among US military servicemen: comparison with the rates in the general US population.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marta GerettoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Marco FerrariTexas Biomedical Research Institute, 8715 W. Military Drive, San Antonio, TX 78227, USA.
Roberta De AngelisDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Filippo CrociataGeneral Inspectorate of Military Health, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Nicola SebastianiGeneral Inspectorate of Military Health, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra PullieroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa,16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5378-9517
William AuFaculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Alberto IzzottiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8588-0347
Ministero della Salute · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITTexas Biomedical Research Institute · USUniversitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMilitary personnel are frequently exposed to environmental pollutants that can cause a variety of diseases.

methodsThis review analyzed publications regarding epidemiological and biomonitoring studies on occupationally-exposed military personnel.

resultsThe exposures include sulfur mustard, organ chlorines, combustion products, fuel vapors, and ionizing and exciting radiations. Important factors to be considered are the lengths and intensities of exposures, its proximity to the sources of environmental pollutants, as well as confounding factors (cigarette smoke, diet, photo-type, healthy warrior effect, etc.). Assessment of environmental and individual exposures to pollutants is crucial, although often omitted, because soldiers have often been evaluated based on reported health problems rather than on excessive exposure to pollutants. Biomarkers of exposures and effects are tools to explore relationships between exposures and diseases in military personnel. Another observation from this review is a major problem from the lack of suitable control groups.

conclusionsThis review indicates that only studies which analyzed epidemiological and molecular biomarkers in both exposed and control groups would provide evidence-based conclusions on exposure and disease risk in military personnel.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsMilitary PersonnelOccupational ExposureEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental HealthEnvironmental MonitoringHumansSmokeEnvironmental PollutantsSmokebiomarkersenvironmental pollutionmolecular epidemiologyoccupational exposuressoldiers

Identifiers

PMID34070145
PMCPMC8158372
OpenAlexW3161568080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.