Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070025›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Rate of Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula after Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Pancreato-Jejunostomy versus Pancreato-Gastrostomy: A Retrospective Case Matched Comparative Study.

Marco V Marino, Adrian Kah Heng Chiow, Antonello Mirabella, Gianpaolo Vaccarella, Andrzej L Komorowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent Advances in Pancreatic Neoplasms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco V MarinoDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Adrian Kah Heng ChiowHepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Antonello MirabellaDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Gianpaolo VaccarellaDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Andrzej L KomorowskiDepartment of General Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent techniques of pancreatic anastomosis have been described, with inconclusive results in terms of pancreatic fistula reduction. Studies comparing robotic pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) are scarcely reported.

methodsThe present study analyzes the outcomes of two case-matched groups of patients who underwent PG (

resultsOperative time (375 vs. 315 min,

conclusionsThe outcomes of post-operative pancreatic fistula are comparable between the two reconstruction techniques. PG may have a lower incidence of POPF in patients with high-risk of pancreatic fistula.

Indexed as

pancreatic fistulapancreato-gastrostomyrobotic pancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34070025
PMCPMC8158101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.