Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34070020›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The New Challenge of Sports Nutrition: Accepting Insect Food as Dietary Supplements in Professional Athletes.

Umberto Placentino, Giovanni Sogari, Rosaria Viscecchia, Biagia De Devitiis, Lucia Monacis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06096389 (Effect of Acheta Domesticus Supplementation on Post-Exercise Muscle Recovery in Recreationally Active Male), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06096389 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Acheta Domesticus Supplementation on Post-Exercise Muscle Recovery in Recreationally Active Male

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsMuscle SorenessArms100 Drop Jumps, Whey supplementation, Carbohydrate supplementation, House cricket supplementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Umberto PlacentinoITAF Sports Centre, Office for the Coordination and Management of Professional Athletes, Vigna di Valle, 00062 Roma, Italy.
Giovanni SogariDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-571X
Rosaria ViscecchiaDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2977-3811
Biagia De DevitiisDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-5028
Lucia MonacisDepartment of Humanities, Literature, Cultural Heritage, Education Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4205-7393
University of Foggia · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dietary supplements market is growing, and their use is increasing among professional athletes. Recently, several new protein supplements have been placed in the marketplace, including energy bars enriched with insect flour. Edible insects, which are rich in protein content, have been promoted as the food of the future and athletes could be a reference sample for their continued emphasis on higher protein demand. The present study investigated the potential motivations to accept an energy protein bar with cricket flour, among a group of selected Italian professional athletes. A second aim was also to measure how an information treatment about the benefits of edible insects would have impact on acceptance.

methods61 Italian professional athletes (27 females) completed a structured questionnaire regarding supplements and eating habits, food neophobia, nutrition knowledge, willingness to taste edible insects and the associated factors. A question about sports endorsement was also posed at the end of the survey.

resultsall subjects consumed supplements, generally recommended by medical personnel, even though their general knowledge of nutrition was poor (47.8%). Our main results shown that on a seven-point Likert scale, the protein content (5.74 ± 1.01) and the curiosity about texture (5.24 ± 0.98) were the main drivers to taste the cricket energy bar; whereas the feeling of disgust (5.58 ± 1.08) justified the rejection of tasting insects. In addition, the level of food neophobia increases with age (

Indexed as

disgustfood neophobiaprotein sourcesport endorsement

Identifiers

PMID34070020
PMCPMC8157859
OpenAlexW3163414646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.