Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34069883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Utility of 18FDG-PET/CT in Diagnosing Fever of Unknown Origin: The Experience of a Large Tertiary Medical Center.

Hussein Mahajna, Keren Vaknin, Jennifer Ben Shimol, Abdulla Watad, Arsalan Abu-Much, Naim Mahroum, Ora Shovman, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Howard Amital, Tima Davidson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hussein MahajnaDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Keren VakninDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Jennifer Ben ShimolSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1884-4925
Abdulla WatadDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-8027
Arsalan Abu-MuchDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Naim MahroumDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Ora ShovmanDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Yehuda ShoenfeldSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Howard AmitalDepartment of Medicine 'B', Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-7716
Tima DavidsonSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) poses a diagnostic challenge, and 18-fluorodexoyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) may identify the source. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of 18FDG-PET/CT in the work-up of FUO. The records of patients admitted to Sheba Medical Center between January 2013 and January 2018 who underwent 18FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of FUO were reviewed. Following examination of available medical test results, 18FDG-PET/CT findings were assessed to determine whether lesions identified proved diagnostic. Of 225 patients who underwent 18FDG-PET/CT for FUO work-up, 128 (57%) met inclusion criteria. Eighty (62.5%) were males; mean age was 59 ± 20.3 (range: 18-93). A final diagnosis was made in 95 (74%) patients. Of the 128 18FDG-PET/CT tests conducted for the workup of FUO, 61 (48%) were true positive, 26 (20%) false positive, 26 (20%) true negative, and 15 (12%) false negative. In a multivariate analysis, weight loss and anemia were independently associated with having a contributary results of 18FDG-PET/CT. The test yielded a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 37%, positive predictive value of 70%, and negative predictive value of 37%. 18FDG-PET/CT is a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of FUO. It proved effective in diagnosing almost half the patients, especially in those with anemia and weight loss.

Indexed as

Fever of Unknown OriginFluorodeoxyglucose F18AdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18FDG-PET/CTfever of unknown originFUOnuclear imagingpositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID34069883
PMCPMC8157390
OpenAlexW3161186262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.