Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34069580›Full record

SynthesisBiomolecules2021

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs).

Gearóid P Tuohy, Roly Megaw

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. AAV vector development, back to the future.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Recombinant adeno-associated virus as a delivery platform for ocular gene therapy: A comprehensive review.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gearóid P TuohyMRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4836-7525
Roly MegawMRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 219607/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IRDs are one of the leading causes of visual loss in children and young adults. Mutations in over 271 genes lead to retinal dysfunction, degeneration and sight loss. Though no cure exists, gene augmentation therapy has brought hope to the field. This systematic review sought to assess the efficacy of available gene therapy treatments for IRDs. Databases and public resources were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). Standard methodological procedures were used, including a risk-of-bias assessment. One RCT and five NRSIs were assessed, all for adeno-associated virus two (AAV2)-mediated treatment of RPE-specific 65 kDa (RPE65)-associated LCA (Leber congenital amaurosis). Five outcomes were reported for meta-analyses. Modest improvements in visual acuity, ambulatory navigation/mobility testing or central retinal thickness was observed. There was significant improvement in red and blue light full-field stimulus testing (FST) (red light risk ratio of 1.89, treated v control,

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyHumansLeber Congenital AmaurosisProof of Concept StudyRetinitis PigmentosaTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuityclinical trialfull-field stimulus testing (FST)gene therapyIRDsLeber congenital amaurosis (LCA)mobilitymulti-luminance mobility testing (MLMT)RCTretinitis pigmentosavisual acuity (VA)

Identifiers

PMID34069580
PMCPMC8160708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.