Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34069507›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Empirical Overview of Benchmark Datasets for Geomagnetic Field-Based Indoor Positioning.

Imran Ashraf, Sadia Din, Soojung Hur, Gunzung Kim, Yongwan Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Smartphone Sensors for Indoor Positioning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-6496
Sadia DinDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0921-4462
Soojung HurDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea.
Gunzung KimDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-0105
Yongwan ParkDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Korea.

Funding

Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning 2017R1E1A1A01074345MSIT(Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) support program IITP-2020-2016-0-00313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor positioning and localization have been regarded as some of the most widely researched areas during the last decade. The wide proliferation of smartphones and the availability of fast-speed internet have initiated several location-based services. Concerning the importance of precise location information, many sensors are embedded into modern smartphones. Besides Wi-Fi positioning, a rich variety of technologies have been introduced or adopted for indoor positioning such as ultrawideband, infrared, radio frequency identification, Bluetooth beacons, pedestrian dead reckoning, and magnetic field, etc. However, special emphasis is put on infrastructureless approaches like Wi-Fi and magnetic field-based positioning, as they do not require additional infrastructure. Magnetic field positioning is an attractive solution for indoors; yet lack of public benchmarks and selection of suitable benchmarks are among the big challenges. While several benchmarks have been introduced over time, the selection criteria of a benchmark are not properly defined, which leads to positioning results that lack generalization. This study aims at analyzing various public benchmarks for magnetic field positioning and highlights their pros and cons for evaluation positioning algorithms. The concept of DUST (device, user, space, time) and DOWTS (dynamicity, orientation, walk, trajectory, and sensor fusion) is introduced which divides the characteristics of the magnetic field dataset into basic and advanced groups and discusses the publicly available datasets accordingly.

Indexed as

benchmark analysisindoor positioningmagnetic field data benchmarksmagnetic field positioningsmartphone sensors

Identifiers

PMID34069507
PMCPMC8160647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.