ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Detection of Ventricular Fibrillation Based on Ballistocardiography by Constructing an Effective Feature Set.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different Ventricular Fibrillation Types in Low-Dimensional Latent Spaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a type of fatal arrhythmia that can cause sudden death within minutes. The study of a VF detection algorithm has important clinical significance. This study aimed to develop an algorithm for the automatic detection of VF based on the acquisition of cardiac mechanical activity-related signals, namely ballistocardiography (BCG), by non-contact sensors. BCG signals, including VF, sinus rhythm, and motion artifacts, were collected through electric defibrillation experiments in pigs. Through autocorrelation and S transform, the time-frequency graph with obvious information of cardiac rhythmic activity was obtained, and a feature set of 13 elements was constructed for each 7 s segment after statistical analysis and hierarchical clustering. Then, the random forest classifier was used to classify VF and non-VF, and two paradigms of intra-patient and inter-patient were used to evaluate the performance. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity were 0.965 and 0.958 under 10-fold cross-validation, and they were 0.947 and 0.946 under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. In conclusion, the proposed algorithm combining feature extraction and machine learning can effectively detect VF in BCG, laying a foundation for the development of long-term self-cardiac monitoring at home and a VF real-time detection and alarm system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.