Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34069079›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Fellow-Eye Comparison between Phaco-Microhook Ab-Interno Trabeculotomy and Phaco-iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent.

Yuji Takayanagi, Sho Ichioka, Akiko Ishida, Aika Tsutsui, Masaki Tanito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Visual Function After Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of 1-year effectiveness between phaco-microhook ab-interno trabeculotomy and phaco-iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent in primary open-angle glaucoma with low-teen intraocular pressure.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuji TakayanagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Sho IchiokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Akiko IshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Aika TsutsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Masaki TanitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-7203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the surgical efficacy and safety between microhook ab-interno trabeculotomy (µLOT) and iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation when both were combined with cataract surgery in both eyes of patients. Sixty-four glaucomatous eyes (32 participants; mean age, 75.9 ± 7.6 years; 15 men, 17 women) were included retrospectively. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber flare (ACF) and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) were evaluated preoperatively, as well as 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Surgical complications and interventions were compared between the procedures. The preoperative IOP and medications with µLOT (18.8 ± 5.7 mmHg and 3.0 ± 1.2, respectively) were higher than with the iStent (15.5 ± 3.4 mmHg and 2.7 ± 1.2, respectively) (

Indexed as

cataract surgeryfellow-eye comparisonintraocular pressureiStent trabecular micro-bypass systemmicrohook ab-interno trabeculotomyminimally invasive glaucoma surgeryTanito microhook (TMH)

Identifiers

PMID34069079
PMCPMC8157143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.