Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068985›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Strategies for Vaccine Prioritization and Mass Dispensing.

Eva K Lee, Zhuonan L Li, Yifan K Liu, James LeDuc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Proposal of a Vaccination Needs Index to Prioritise Municipal Interventions in Brazil.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026
    Article
  4. Enhancing Mass Vaccination Programs with Queueing Theory and Spatial Optimization.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva K LeeNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-4640
Zhuonan L LiNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3970-7014
Yifan K LiuNSF-Whitaker Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9883-0293
James LeDucGalveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

CDC HHS 200-2016-90873National Science Foundation IIP-1516074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a system that helps decision makers during a pandemic find, in real time, the mass vaccination strategies that best utilize limited medical resources to achieve fast containments and population protection. Our general-purpose framework integrates into a single computational platform a multi-purpose compartmental disease propagation model, a human behavior network, a resource logistics model, and a stochastic queueing model for vaccination operations. We apply the modeling framework to the current COVID-19 pandemic and derive an optimal trigger for switching from a prioritized vaccination strategy to a non-prioritized strategy so as to minimize the overall attack rate and mortality rate. When vaccine supply is limited, such a mixed vaccination strategy is broadly effective. Our analysis suggests that delays in vaccine supply and inefficiencies in vaccination delivery can substantially impede the containment effort. Employing an optimal mixed strategy can significantly reduce the attack and mortality rates. The more infectious the virus, the earlier it helps to open the vaccine to the public. As vaccine efficacy decreases, the attack and mortality rates rapidly increase by multiples; this highlights the importance of early vaccination to reduce spreading as quickly as possible to lower the chances for further mutations to evolve and to reduce the excessive healthcare burden. To maximize the protective effect of available vaccines, of equal importance are determining the optimal mixed strategy and implementing effective on-the-ground dispensing. The optimal mixed strategy is quite robust against variations in model parameters and can be implemented readily in practice. Studies with our holistic modeling framework strongly support the urgent need for early vaccination in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Our framework permits rapid custom modeling in practice. Additionally, it is generalizable for different types of infectious disease outbreaks, whereby a user may determine for a given type the effects of different interventions including the optimal switch trigger.

Indexed as

biological-behavior-logistics-queueing computational frameworkmass vaccinationmixed vaccination strategyswitch triggervaccine efficacyvaccine prioritization

Identifiers

PMID34068985
PMCPMC8157047
OpenAlexW3161240045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.