Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068921›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review.

Guus Gijsbertus Hubert van den Akker, Federico Zacchini, Bas Adrianus Catharina Housmans, Laura van der Vloet, Marjolein Maria Johanna Caron, Lorenzo Montanaro, Tim Johannes Maria Welting

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Small Molecules Targeting Viral RNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Depletion ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Guus Gijsbertus Hubert van den AkkerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University, Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Federico ZacchiniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6038-1779
Bas Adrianus Catharina HousmansDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University, Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Laura van der VloetDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University, Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein Maria Johanna CaronDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University, Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-9211
Lorenzo MontanaroDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-9518
Tim Johannes Maria WeltingDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University, Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLAzienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Fondazione AIRC per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) IG 21562Stichting de Weijerhorst Bewegen zonder PijnTTW/NWO Perspectief P15-23; William Hunter revisited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter assays and data presentation or normalization procedures. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for bicistronic IRES reporter studies and analyzed methodological details, data visualization, and normalization procedures. Two hundred fifty-seven publications were identified using our search strategy (published 1994-2020). Experimental studies on eukaryotic adherent cell systems and the cell-free translation assay were included for further analysis. We evaluated the following methodological details for 176 full text articles: the bicistronic reporter design, the cell line or type, transfection methods, and time point of analyses post-transfection. For the cell-free translation assay, we focused on methods of in vitro transcription, type of translation lysate, and incubation times and assay temperature. Data can be presented in multiple ways: raw data from individual cistrons, a ratio of the two, or fold changes thereof. In addition, many different control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. In addition, many different normalization and control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. Therefore, we also categorized and summarized their use. Our unbiased analyses provide a representative overview of bicistronic IRES reporter use. We identified parameters that were reported inconsistently or incompletely, which could hamper data reproduction and interpretation. On the basis of our analyses, we encourage adhering to a number of practices that should improve transparency of bicistronic reporter data presentation and improve methodological descriptions to facilitate data replication.

Indexed as

Genes, ReporterInternal Ribosome Entry SitesProtein BiosynthesisRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsHumansRibosomesInternal Ribosome Entry Sitesbicistronic reporterdicistronic reporterIRESmRNA translationribosomesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34068921
PMCPMC8156625
OpenAlexW3162600776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.