SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Performance of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Emergency System in COVID-19 Pandemic. An Extensive Narrative Review.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Digestive Physiology and Evolutionary Diet: A Metabolomic Perspective on Carnivorous and Scavenger Adaptations.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Biometric Strategies to Improve Vaccine Immunogenicity and Effectiveness.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Acute effects of a single functional neurology session on autonomic modulation in a patient with mild depression: a case report.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- New Insights and Potential Therapeutic Interventions in Metabolic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Systematic review of MCDM approach applied to the medical case studies of COVID-19: trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, motivations, recommendations, and future directions.Complex & intelligent systems · 2023Article
- Basis of preventive and non-pharmacological interventions in asthma.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Identifying resilience strategies for disruption management in the healthcare supply chain during COVID-19 by digital innovations: A systematic literature review.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2023Review
- Intelligent System for Detecting Deterioration of Life Satisfaction as Tool for Remote Mental-Health Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A fuzzy approach to support decision-making in the triage process for suspected COVID-19 patients in Brazil.Applied soft computing · 2022Article
- The Burden of Carbohydrates in Health and Disease.Nutrients · 2022Review
- The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.Applied soft computing · 2022Review
- Benchmarking sustainable E-commerce enterprises based on evolving customer expectations amidst COVID-19 pandemic.Business strategy and the environment · 2022Article
- Mis-Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Nutritional and Exercise Interventions in Cancer-Related Cachexia: An Extensive Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Physical activity and COVID-19. The basis for an efficient intervention in times of COVID-19 pandemic.Physiology & behavior · 2022Review
- Knowledge Mapping of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- A Multicriteria Approach for Measuring Employee Well-Being.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Disorders. A Critical Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- COVID-19 and the Impact on the Cranio-Oro-Facial Trauma Care in Italy: An Epidemiological Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Women Facing Psychological Abuse: How Do They Respond to Maternal Identity Humiliation and Body Shaming?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The actual coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the limit of emergency systems worldwide, leading to the collapse of health systems, police, first responders, as well as other areas. Various ways of dealing with this world crisis have been proposed from many aspects, with fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis being a method that can be applied to a wide range of emergency systems and professional groups, aiming to confront several associated issues and challenges. The purpose of this critical review was to discuss the basic principles, present current applications during the first pandemic wave, and propose future implications of this methodology. For this purpose, both primary sources, such as scientific articles, and secondary ones, such as bibliographic indexes, web pages, and databases, were used. The main search engines were PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar. The method was a systematic literature review of the available literature regarding the performance of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis of emergency systems in the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study highlight the importance of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis method as a beneficial tool for healthcare workers and first responders' emergency professionals to face this pandemic as well as to manage the created uncertainty and its related risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.