Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068811›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

3D Printing Techniques and Their Applications to Organ-on-a-Chip Platforms: A Systematic Review.

Violeta Carvalho, Inês Gonçalves, Teresa Lage, Raquel O Rodrigues, Graça Minas, Senhorinha F C F Teixeira, Ana S Moita, Takeshi Hori, Hirokazu Kaji, Rui A Lima

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Advances in Microfluidic Cochlea-On-A-Chip.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Violeta CarvalhoMEtRICs, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9447-4746
Inês GonçalvesMEtRICs, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7986-8934
Teresa LageCenter for MicroElectromechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
Raquel O RodriguesCenter for MicroElectromechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-2654
Graça MinasCenter for MicroElectromechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2460-0556
Senhorinha F C F TeixeiraALGORITMI Center, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7464-3944
Ana S MoitaIN+, Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9801-7617
Takeshi HoriDepartment of Finemechanics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-3379
Hirokazu KajiDepartment of Finemechanics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2566-4172
Rui A LimaMEtRICs, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3428-637X

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-029394Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-030171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models, such as organ-on-a-chip platforms, are an emerging and effective technology that allows the replication of the function of tissues and organs, bridging the gap amid the conventional models based on planar cell cultures or animals and the complex human system. Hence, they have been increasingly used for biomedical research, such as drug discovery and personalized healthcare. A promising strategy for their fabrication is 3D printing, a layer-by-layer fabrication process that allows the construction of complex 3D structures. In contrast, 3D bioprinting, an evolving biofabrication method, focuses on the accurate deposition of hydrogel bioinks loaded with cells to construct tissue-engineered structures. The purpose of the present work is to conduct a systematic review (SR) of the published literature, according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, providing a source of information on the evolution of organ-on-a-chip platforms obtained resorting to 3D printing and bioprinting techniques. In the literature search, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were used, and two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. The goal of this SR is to highlight the importance and advantages of using 3D printing techniques in obtaining organ-on-a-chip platforms, and also to identify potential gaps and future perspectives in this research field. Additionally, challenges in integrating sensors in organs-on-chip platforms are briefly investigated and discussed.

Indexed as

BioprintingLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsHumansHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringHydrogels3D bioprintingbiofabricationbiomicrofluidicsbiosensorsin vitro modelsorgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID34068811
PMCPMC8126238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.