Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068653›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2021

Role of Gut Microbiota and Probiotics in Colorectal Cancer: Onset and Progression.

Edgar Torres-Maravilla, Anne-Sophie Boucard, Amir Hossein Mohseni, Sedigheh Taghinezhad-S, Naima G Cortes-Perez, Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Lactobacillus johnsonii Generates Cyclo(pro-trp) and Promotes Intestinal CaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edgar Torres-MaravillaMicalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Anne-Sophie BoucardMicalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-0954
Amir Hossein MohseniDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0320-9523
Sedigheh Taghinezhad-SDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4497-4427
Naima G Cortes-PerezUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR 0496, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Luis G Bermúdez-HumaránMicalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7525-3131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis in the human body, and the disruption of these communities can lead to compromised host health and the onset of disease. Current research on probiotics is quite promising and, in particular, these microorganisms have demonstrated their potential for use as adjuvants for the treatment of colorectal cancer. This review addresses the possible applications of probiotics, postbiotics, synbiotics, and next-generation probiotics in colorectal cancer research.

Indexed as

cancercolorectal cancerlactic acid bacteriamicrobiotaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID34068653
PMCPMC8151957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.