Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068399›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Lower-Limb Lymphedema after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cervical Cancer Patients.

David Cibula, Martina Borčinová, Simone Marnitz, Jiří Jarkovský, Jaroslav Klát, Radovan Pilka, Aureli Torné, Ignacio Zapardiel, Almerinda Petiz, Laura Lay and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. RELEVANT-C study: patient-reported prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping vs lymphadenectomy after surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multicentric development and evaluation ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

David CibulaGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-9356
Martina BorčinováGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.
Simone MarnitzDepartment of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany.
Jiří JarkovskýData Analysis Department, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav KlátDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic.
Radovan PilkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Aureli TornéUnit of Gynecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynaecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-9507
Ignacio ZapardielGynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-7767
Almerinda PetizServiço de Ginecologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto, 1099-023 Porto, Portugal.
Laura LayDepartment of Gynaecology, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo University of Bueno s Aires, Buenos Aires C1417 DTB, Argentina.
Borek SehnalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Bulovka, Charles University, 18081 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-2181
Jordi PonceDepartment of Gynecology, Biomedical Research Institute of Bellvitge (IDIBELL), University Hospital of Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-2261
Michal FelsingerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-5675
Octavio Arencibia-SánchezDepartments of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Peter KaščákDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Trencin, 911 71 Trencin, Slovakia.
Kamil ZalewskiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland.
Jiri PreslDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, University Hospital in Pilsen and Charles University, 30460 Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7632-4069
Alicia Palop-MoscardóGynecology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-0275
Solveig TingulstadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
Ignace VergoteDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Mikuláš RedechaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Comenius University, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Filip FrühaufGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.
Christhardt KöhlerDepartment of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany.
Roman KociánGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Czech Health research Council NV19-03-00023Univerzita Karlova v Praze PROGRES Q28/LF1Univerzita Karlova v Praze UNCE 204065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo prospectively assess LLL incidence among cervical cancer patients treated by uterine surgery complemented by SLN biopsy, without PLND.

methodsA prospective study in 150 patients with stage IA1-IB2 cervical cancer treated by uterine surgery with bilateral SLN biopsy. Objective LLL assessments, based on limb volume increase (LVI) between pre- and postoperative measurements, and subjective patient-perceived swelling were conducted in six-month periods over 24-months post-surgery.

resultsThe cumulative incidence of LLL at 24 months was 17.3% for mild LLL (LVI 10-19%), 9.2% for moderate LLL (LVI 20-39%), while only one patient (0.7%) developed severe LLL (LVI > 40%). The median interval to LLL onset was nine months. Transient edema resolving without intervention within six months was reported in an additional 22% of patients. Subjective LLL was reported by 10.7% of patients, though only a weak and partial correlation between subjective-report and objective-LVI was found. No risk factor directly related to LLL development was identified.

conclusionsThe replacement of standard PLND by bilateral SLN biopsy in the surgical treatment of cervical cancer does not eliminate the risk of mild to moderate LLL, which develops irrespective of the number of SLN removed.

Indexed as

cervical cancerlower limb lymphedemapelvic lymphadenectomysentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34068399
PMCPMC8153612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.