Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068301›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injuries Assessment during Pancreas Preservation.

Thomas Prudhomme, John F Mulvey, Liam A J Young, Benoit Mesnard, Maria Letizia Lo Faro, Ann Etohan Ogbemudia, Fungai Dengu, Peter J Friend, Rutger Ploeg, James P Hunter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Donor- and isolation-related predictive factors ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas PrudhommeInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-9339
John F MulveyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3843-2442
Liam A J YoungNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-421X
Benoit MesnardInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3314-1892
Maria Letizia Lo FaroNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Ann Etohan OgbemudiaNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Fungai DenguNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Peter J FriendNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Rutger PloegNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
James P HunterNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Julien BranchereauInstitut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-9352
University of Oxford · GBInserm · FRJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining organ viability between donation and transplantation is of critical importance for optimal graft function and survival. To date in pancreas transplantation, static cold storage (SCS) is the most widely practiced method of organ preservation. The first experiments in ex vivo perfusion of the pancreas were performed at the beginning of the 20th century. These perfusions led to organ oedema, hemorrhage, and venous congestion after revascularization. Despite these early hurdles, a number of factors now favor the use of perfusion during preservation: the encouraging results of HMP in kidney transplantation, the development of new perfusion solutions, and the development of organ perfusion machines for the lung, heart, kidneys and liver. This has led to a resurgence of research in machine perfusion for whole organ pancreas preservation. This review highlights the ischemia-reperfusion injuries assessment during ex vivo pancreas perfusion, both for assessment in pre-clinical experimental models as well for future use in the clinic. We evaluated perfusion dynamics, oedema assessment, especially by impedance analysis and MRI, whole organ oxygen consumption, tissue oxygen tension, metabolite concentrations in tissue and perfusate, mitochondrial respiration, cell death, especially by histology, total cell free DNA, caspase activation, and exocrine and endocrine assessment.

Indexed as

Pancreas TransplantationTissue SurvivalAnimalsHumansOrgan PreservationPancreasReperfusion InjuryHypothermic perfusionIschemia ReperfusionNormothermic perfusionPancreas perfusion

Identifiers

PMID34068301
PMCPMC8153272
OpenAlexW3162067738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.