Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068263›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Inhibitory Effect of Apomorphine on Focal and Nonfocal Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex.

Shane M Fresnoza, Giorgi Batsikadze, Lynn Elena Müller, Constanze Rost, Michael Chamoun, Walter Paulus, Min-Fang Kuo, Michael A Nitsche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shane M FresnozaInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-2285
Giorgi BatsikadzeDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Lynn Elena MüllerDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Constanze RostDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Michael ChamounDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Walter PaulusDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-8377
Min-Fang KuoDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DETU Dortmund University · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine is crucial for neuroplasticity, which is considered to be the neurophysiological foundation of learning and memory. The specific effect of dopamine on plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) is determined by receptor subtype specificity, concentration level, and the kind of plasticity induction technique. In healthy human subjects, the dopamine precursor levodopa (L-DOPA) exerts a dosage-dependent non-linear effect on motor cortex plasticity. Low and high dosage L-DOPA impaired or abolished plasticity, while medium-dose preserved and reversed plasticity in previous studies. Similar dosage-dependent effects were also observed for selective D1-like and D2-like receptor activation that favor excitatory and inhibitory plasticity, respectively. However, such a dosage-dependent effect has not been explored for a nonselective dopamine agonist such as apomorphine in humans. To this aim, nonfocal and focal motor cortex plasticity induction using paired associative stimulation (PAS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) were performed respectively in healthy participants under 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg apomorphine or placebo drug. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials were used to monitor motor cortical excitability alterations. We hypothesized that, similar to L-DOPA, apomorphine will affect motor cortex plasticity. The results showed that apomorphine with the applied dosages has an inhibitory effect for focal and nonfocal LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity, which was either abolished, diminished or reversed. The detrimental effect on plasticity induction under all dosages of apomorphine suggests a predominantly presynaptic mechanism of action of these dosages.

Indexed as

apomorphine: transcranial direct current stimulationdopaminemotor cortexmotor evoked potentialpaired associative stimulationplasticitytranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34068263
PMCPMC8153161
OpenAlexW3160243036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.