Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34068059›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Executive Function Improves Following Acute Exercise in Adults with Down Syndrome.

Shannon Ringenbach, Nathanial Arnold, Brandon Myer, Claire Hayes, Kahyun Nam, Chih-Chia Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon RingenbachCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85004, USA.
Nathanial ArnoldCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85004, USA.
Brandon MyerCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85004, USA.
Claire HayesCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85004, USA.
Kahyun NamCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85004, USA.
Chih-Chia ChenDepartment of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Arizona State University · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of exercise on brain function is an important topic, especially in persons with intellectual deficits. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of an acute bout of resistance training (RT) compared to assisted cycle therapy (ACT) and no training (NT) in adults with DS on cognitive function. Fourteen participants attended four sessions: a baseline assessment, an assisted cycling therapy (ACT) session, a resistance training (RT) session, and a session of no training (NT). In the RT session, the leg press, chest press, seated row, leg curl, shoulder press, and latissimus pulldown were performed. The ACT session consisted of 30 min of cycling and in NT session consisted of 20 min of board games. Inhibition was measured by the Erikson flanker task and cognitive planning was measured by the Tower of London test and both were administered prior to (pretest) and after each intervention (posttest). Our results showed that inhibition time improved more following RT and ACT than NT. There was also a significant difference between ACT and NT. For cognitive planning, improvements were seen following ACT and NT. In conclusion, an acute session of ACT demonstrated a significant trend towards improvements in executive functions in adults with DS which we interpreted using a model of neural changes and the cognitive stimulation hypothesis.

Indexed as

cognitive functioncyclingintellectual disabilityphysical activityweight training

Identifiers

PMID34068059
PMCPMC8152466
OpenAlexW3162918764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.