ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
HADF-Crowd: A Hierarchical Attention-Based Dense Feature Extraction Network for Single-Image Crowd Counting.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on steel rail surface defects detection based on improved YOLOv4 network.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- Context-Aware Multi-Scale Aggregation Network for Congested Crowd Counting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An effective modular approach for crowd counting in an image using convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crowd counting is a challenging task due to large perspective, density, and scale variations. CNN-based crowd counting techniques have achieved significant performance in sparse to dense environments. However, crowd counting in high perspective-varying scenes (images) is getting harder due to different density levels occupied by the same number of pixels. In this way large variations for objects in the same spatial area make it difficult to count accurately. Further, existing CNN-based crowd counting methods are used to extract rich deep features; however, these features are used locally and disseminated while propagating through intermediate layers. This results in high counting errors, especially in dense and high perspective-variation scenes. Further, class-specific responses along channel dimensions are underestimated. To address these above mentioned issues, we therefore propose a CNN-based dense feature extraction network for accurate crowd counting. Our proposed model comprises three main modules: (1) backbone network, (2) dense feature extraction modules (DFEMs), and (3) channel attention module (CAM). The backbone network is used to obtain general features with strong transfer learning ability. The DFEM is composed of multiple sub-modules called dense stacked convolution modules (DSCMs), densely connected with each other. In this way features extracted from lower and middle-lower layers are propagated to higher layers through dense connections. In addition, combinations of task independent general features obtained by the former modules and task-specific features obtained by later ones are incorporated to obtain high counting accuracy in large perspective-varying scenes. Further, to exploit the class-specific response between background and foreground, CAM is incorporated at the end to obtain high-level features along channel dimensions for better counting accuracy. Moreover, we have evaluated the proposed method on three well known datasets: Shanghaitech (Part-A), Shanghaitech (Part-B), and Venice. The performance of the proposed technique justifies its relative effectiveness in terms of selected performance compared to state-of-the-art techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.